Tuesday, 15. September 2026 --:--
Al Khabariya
independent persian newsroom
Analysis

U.S. Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Law Reducing Student Visa Validity

ت · 2 min · 33,187
U.S. Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Law Reducing Student Visa Validity منبع تصویر: aa.com.tr
U.S. Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Law Reducing Student Visa Validity

A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked a law that reduced the validity of student and foreign journalist visas. The judge stated that the Trump administration's reasons for implementing this law were weak.

Judge F. Dennis Saylor blocked a law in a federal court in Massachusetts that would have reduced the validity of student, academic, and journalist visas for foreign nationals. This law, issued at the direction of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, was announced on July 17 and limited all student and academic visas to four years. Additionally, for journalists, this validity was reduced to 240 days.

Judge's Reasons for Blocking the Law

In his ruling, Judge Saylor stated that the Trump administration's reasons for limiting the stay of these groups were "exceptionally weak." Three organizations representing universities and educational institutions, along with four labor unions, including one for journalists, filed a lawsuit to block this law, which affected the lives of 1.6 million individuals on F visas and 500,000 on J visas.

Under this law, foreign journalists were required to apply for visa extensions from the Department of Homeland Security, and if their applications were denied, there was no way to appeal that decision. Judge Saylor pointed out in his ruling that the Trump administration's reasons for implementing this law were so arbitrary that the law itself was illegal.

Economic and Social Consequences of the Law

Judge Saylor also noted that damage to the U.S. higher education system and the economy could be catastrophic. He stated that the costs associated with implementing this law would likely exceed $250 million in the first year. The judge also referenced the plaintiffs' argument that this change would make the United States a less attractive destination for the best students in the world.

Saylor emphasized that many American universities and educational institutions currently facing declining enrollment due to demographic changes would be harmed by this law. He added that the government's claim that this law is necessary for national security is "so ridiculous that it is unacceptable." Judge Saylor ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.

Source: aa.com.tr

SHARE WhatsApp Telegram X Facebook